ruffboi: (punch a ghost)
Bobby "Magnus" Burnsides ([personal profile] ruffboi) wrote2018-03-18 11:23 pm

week 1; post erasure

[Since there's no one he wants to kill this week, there's no real urgency for him tracking down Sekreuz. But once the Erasure is over, he'll go find him for a bit.]

So. Let's talk! You gonna jump in front of my axe if I try and kill a reaper?

[Clearly, he hasn't figured out he doesn't find this funny.]
subordinacy: (46.)

[personal profile] subordinacy 2018-03-19 03:33 am (UTC)(link)
[Setz is calmer now that it's not, like, the heat of the moment, but.]

... Do you have to be smiling as you say that?
subordinacy: (40.)

[personal profile] subordinacy 2018-03-19 03:43 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not short. You're just tall.

[There's a difference, okay.]

... Should I be honoured?
subordinacy: (5.)

[personal profile] subordinacy 2018-03-19 04:20 am (UTC)(link)
[Well then.

Anyway, you asked, Magnus, so get ready.]


Especially in the case of that trial, we had no concrete evidence pointing either way. What if we'd had more suspects? [...] My basic stats are almost the same as Noctis's. If I'd happened to buy new clothes this week, I would've been as suspicious as him.

If we'd had more than those two, would you have killed everyone?

Secondly— [BECAUSE HE ISN'T DONE] —if both had been innocent, then it'd already be bad enough that we collectively killed one and their partner! And at least then, there was some sort of process and agreement, even if just in a farce for a trial. Independently killing someone to ensure your own survival barely makes you different from a Reaper.

Not to mention that while I don't doubt your intentions, at least in that moment... say that someone killed another person, claiming that they thought they were a Reaper. How can the rest of us trust that? We were encouraged at the start of this Game to erase one another, to compete for the limited revival spots. How would we know that this person didn't just commit an erasure to cull the numbers—or secretly a Reaper themselves?

If we start justifying independent kills, we give people lies to hide behind.

Finally, as long as we don't know how many Reapers there are... pragmatically, it makes some sense to keep known ones around. Even if they can't provide us with any information, then for the next trial, if we have no leads, we can erase them as a last resort.

[Which is colder than he'd like, but he's here to appeal to Magnus, not debate that level of morality.]

It's only important when there's just one Reaper left. Until then, it doesn't make much of a difference how many there are—you don't need that many to kill someone, especially considering that both Dahlia Hawthorne and Terra apparently carried out their erasures alone.

[Okay, he's done (or at least pausing to breathe). Amazingly, he did not have this all prepared beforehand.]
subordinacy: (45.)

[personal profile] subordinacy 2018-03-19 05:10 am (UTC)(link)
Being too obvious helps with getting away with things, so saying it's not a "subtle trick" doesn't really work out here. If Junko Enoshima suddenly pointed at someone, declared them a Reaper, and then killed them, should we all just nod our heads and accept that?

And part of my point was that not letting them walk away won't help us at this stage. Erasing Dahlia Hawthorne didn't prevent Lion's erasure. Erasing Terra won't prevent next week's erasure either. As of right now, killing people because they're Reapers... actually, not even that.

Killing people because they're possibly Reapers is only self-gratifying; in terms of practicality, it won't protect a single person.
subordinacy: (46.)

[personal profile] subordinacy 2018-03-19 12:23 pm (UTC)(link)
You're free to disagree, but know everything I said still stands, provided that Monika doesn't literally cling to my back. Seeing as how I was murdered so that someone could feel better, over imaginary wrongdoings in his head, you'll have to excuse me if this is something I take rather seriously.
subordinacy: (2.)

[personal profile] subordinacy 2018-03-19 01:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Intimidate people however you like; I don't mind. Though for your sake and his, I hope your partner can look after himself as well as you can, as I'd rather not see you end up with a target on your back for this.

... And if you do take out that axe and I think you've made a premature judgment, then know that I'll act—whether or not you think it's practical.
subordinacy: (6.)

[personal profile] subordinacy 2018-03-19 01:27 pm (UTC)(link)
[Setz will take Magnus's word for it that Taako would not react to an actual murder attempt the, uh, same way (though he looks dubious).]

Better than nothing. [And with that, he looks exhausted now.] You're actually more rational than I thought you'd be.
Edited 2018-03-19 13:27 (UTC)
subordinacy: (15.)

[personal profile] subordinacy 2018-03-19 01:44 pm (UTC)(link)
You should try to have higher standards for compliments.